Reum et al. v. Reum et al.
| Marcus T. Reum |
| Mary A. Reum |
| 9:2021cv00080 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Donald W Molloy |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (NOS) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Petitioners' motion for emergency ex parte order (Doc. #7 ) and Petitioners' motion to quash and show cause (Doc. #9 ) are DENIED as MOOT. Any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 8/10/2021. (NOS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Quash and Show Cause by Petitioner Marcus T. Reum (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Exhibit Criminal Complaint, #3 Exhibit FIRST EMAIL ATTACHMENT FROM DEFENDANT OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS FEDERAL COURT 04-14-2021, #4 Exhibit Order of Release and Setting Court Dates 04-01-2021, #5 Exhibit SECOND EMAIL FROM DEFT RE NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE 02-22-2021, #6 Exhibit NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND CONSOLIDATION OF CASES 04-02-2021, #7 Exhibit SUMMONS-CITY OF GIG HARBOR 8-5-2021, #8 Exhibit WARRANT OF ARREST 05-19-2021, #9 Exhibit THIRD EMAIL FROM DEFENDANT 04-14-2021, #10 Text of Proposed Order, #11 Submission Email) (TAG) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION re #7 MOTION for Emergency Ex Parte Order by Marcus T. Reum. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit O, #3 Exhibit P, #4 Exhibit T, #5 Exhibit W, #6 Exhibit X, #7 Exhibit Y, #8 Exhibit Z, #9 Exhibit AA, #10 Exhibit BB, #11 Submission Email) (TAG) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Emergency Ex Parte Order by Petitioner Marcus T. Reum (Attachments: #1 Notice of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit O, #3 Exhibit T, #4 Exhibit U, #5 V, #6 Text of Proposed Order, #7 Submission Email) (TAG) |
| Filing 6 Agreement to Allow Pro Se Party to File by E-Mail. (TAG) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se Request for Leave to File by E-mail by Marcus T. Reum. (TAG) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Electronic Service by Marcus T. Reum (TAG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (Attachments: #1 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE, #2 PRO SE REQUEST TO FILE BY EMAIL) Mailed to Reum with docket sheet (TAG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Marcus T. Reum (TAG) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Marcus T. Reum. (Attachment(s): #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A-S) (TAG). Modified on 8/10/2021; Petition deemed filed - Motion to proceed IFP granted. (NOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reum et al. v. Reum et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marcus T. Reum | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mary A. Reum | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
