McKain v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
| Mary McKain |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America |
| 9:2021cv00100 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Donald W Molloy |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 11/24/2021. Joint Discovery Plan due by 11/24/2021. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 11/24/2021. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2021 at 1:30 PM in the Russell Smith Courthouse, Missoula, MT before Judge Donald W. Molloy. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/18/2021. (dle)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #5 Order. Here, Safeco demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy at issue in this case, including the attorney fees potentially recoverable under the insurance exception to the American Rule, exceeds the jurisdictional threshold. This matter will be set for a preliminary pretrial conference by separate order. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/18/2021. (dle)
|
|
Filing 8
STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Safeco Insurance Company of America, filed by Mary McKain. (APP)
|
|
Filing 7
STATE COURT PLEADINGS (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings) (APP)
|
|
Filing 6
Brief/Response to Order re #5 Order filed by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Katherine S. Huso) (Huso, Katherine) (Filer attempted to file on 9/30/21 and was unable due to CM/ECF and NextGen migration issues.)(NOS)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Safeco much show cause why this matter should not be remanded to the state district court for lack of jurisdiction. Safeco's response shall be due no later than September 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 9/17/2021. (NOS)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Change of Address by Tyler G. Moss (Moss, Tyler)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler G. Moss on behalf of Mary McKain (Moss, Tyler)
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Huso, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Safeco Insurance Company of America from Montana Twentieth Judicial District, Lake County, case number DV-21-148. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (TAG)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0977-2726696 (TAG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McKain v. Safeco Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary McKain | |
| Represented By: | Matthew H. O'Neill |
| Represented By: | Tyler G. Moss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Carey E. Matovich |
| Represented By: | Katherine Huso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
