Winkler v. WIPFLI, LLP et al
Plaintiff: Jason Winkler
Defendant: WIPFLI, LLP and John Does 1-100
Case Number: 9:2022cv00121
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Dana L Christensen
Referring Judge: Kathleen L DeSoto
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Filing 13 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by WIPFLI, LLP. (Roth, Jeffrey)
September 6, 2022 Filing 12 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Jason Winkler. (Simkins, Sarah)
September 6, 2022 Filing 11 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Jason Winkler. (Simkins, Sarah)
September 6, 2022 Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Jason Winkler. (Simkins, Sarah)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Withholding Consent. Consent to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge having been either withheld or met with objection, this case remains ASSIGNED to the Honorable Judge Christensen. The case remains REFERRED to the Honorable Judge DeSoto. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/10/2022. (APP)
July 14, 2022 Filing 8 Service of Consent to Magistrate Judge as Presiding Judge form. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 7/28/2022. (APP)
July 14, 2022 Filing 7 STATE COURT DOCUMENTS (APP)
July 14, 2022 Filing 6 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against WIPFLI, LLP, filed by Jason Winkler. (APP)
July 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Roth on behalf of WIPFLI, LLP (Roth, Jeffrey)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 9/6/2022. Joint Discovery Plan due by 9/6/2022. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 9/6/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 9/13/2022 at 01:30 PM in Missoula, MT before Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 7/12/2022. (TXB)
July 12, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by WIPFLI, LLP. (Roth, Jeffrey)
July 11, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WIPFLI, LLP. (Roth, Jeffrey)
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WIPFLI, LLP from Montana Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, case number DV-15-2022-0000568-BC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (TAG)
July 11, 2022 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-2901044 (TAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winkler v. WIPFLI, LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Winkler
Represented By: Sarah D. Simkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WIPFLI, LLP
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Roth
Represented By: Kelsey Sabol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?