Anderson v. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services et al
| Michael T Anderson |
| Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services and Missoula Housing Authority |
| 9:2023cv00075 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Dana L Christensen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PRO SE REGISTRATION FORM by Plaintiff Michael T Anderson. (SGN) |
| Filing 7 USCA ORDER. The petition is denied. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. (SGN) |
| Filing 6 Mail sent to Anderson Returned as Undeliverable. (TAG) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court of the Filing of Amended Complaint in the District Court by Michael T Anderson (SGN) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Michael T Anderson. (SGN) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2023: #1 Exhibit A) (SGN). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Anderson with docket sheet. (SGN) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by Michael T Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (KJL) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. by Plaintiff Michael T Anderson. (KJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
