Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
| Amber Baptiste |
| Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital, Diane M Doolittle, Quinn Emanuel LLP, Rosewood Sand Hill Hotel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Goodwin Proctor, Glaser Weil and Rivers Morrell |
| 9:2023cv00088 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Donald W Molloy |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE as to re: #13 Pro Se Notice filed by Defendant Michael Lewis Goguen. (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 13 Pro Se Notice by Amber Baptiste (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration In Support ofEx-Parte Application, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Baptiste, Amber) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT re #10 Brief/Memorandum in Support,, Exhibit 1 - Final Statement of Decision by Michael Lewis Goguen. (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 11 Sealed Document Unredacted re: #10 Brief/Memorandum in Support,, filed by Michael Lewis Goguen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 7 - 2023-03-28 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 9 - 2023-06-14 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 11 - 2023-07-06 Complaint) (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Michael Lewis Goguen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - 2020.01.24 Initial Restraining Order, #2 Exhibit 3 - 2023.03.06 Restraining Order, #3 Exhibit 4 - 2023.01.06 Order, #4 Exhibit 5 - 2023.05.18 Order to Show Cause, #5 Exhibit 6 - 2023.08.22 Order re Contempt, #6 Exhibit 8 - 2023-05-22 (038) Order Dismissing Case, #7 Exhibit 10 - 2023-06-16 (005) Order Terminating Case, #8 Exhibit 12 - 2023-08-01 (008) Transfer Order) (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Reid Perkins appearing for Defendant Michael Lewis Goguen. (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal filed by Michael Lewis Goguen. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT A - Email from Baptiste, #2 EXHIBIT B - Order Re Motion to Seal and Restraining Orders, #3 EXHIBIT C -2023.05.22 Order Re Request to Proceed in Forma Pa Uperis, #4 EXHIBIT D - 2023-04-06 (009) Order Provisionally Granting Ex Parte, #5 EXHIBIT E - 2023-04-18 (017) Order Granting Ex Parte to Seal, #6 EXHIBIT F - 2023-05-16 (035) Order Granting Ex Parte to Seal) (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal . Reid Perkins appearing for Defendant Michael Lewis Goguen. (Perkins, Reid) |
| Filing 6 Pro Se Motion by Amber Baptiste (Baptiste, Amber) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE REGISTRATION FORM by Plaintiff Amber Doe. (SGN) |
| REMARK: E-filing request approved and sent to PACER for Plaintiff Amber Baptiste. (SGN) |
| Filing 4 Mail re #3 sent to Doe Returned as Undeliverable. (TAG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Doe with docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent to Electronic Service, #2 ECF Registration Form) (TAG) |
| Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Amber Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Proposed Summons) (TAG) (Exhibits 2 and 3 sealed as they contain personal identifiers.) (NOS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Amber Doe. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
