Holly et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Katrina Holly, Jodie Nordness and Sienna Lilly |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 9:2024cv00051 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Dana L Christensen |
| Kathleen L DeSoto |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Cockrell, Dale) |
| Filing 3 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Cockrell, Dale) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint. Dale R. Cockrell appearing for Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Cockrell, Dale) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, case number DV-15-2024-0000468-PI. (Attachments: #1 A) Civil ROA & Case Documents, #2 B) Bad Faith Verdicts, #3 C) Cavin Order, #4 Text of Proposed Order) (TAG) |
| Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMTDC-3252060 (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
