Rizo v. The Litigation Practice Group, PC
Rizo and Johnny W. Rizo |
The Litigation Practice Group, PC |
CAE/2:22-CV-01959 |
October 31, 2022 |
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
Dale A Drozd |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT re: pldg. ( 3 in MDL No. 3065), ( 1 in MDL No. 3065), ( 2 in MDL No. 3065) -- Identifying Corporate Parent No Parent Corp. for The Litigation Practice Group, PC. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:22-cv-00917, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (Anderson, Matthew) Modified on 12/28/2022 (JC). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTY NAMES |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( 3 in MDL No. 3065), ( 1 in MDL No. 3065), ( 2 in MDL No. 3065) Filed by Matthew T. Anderson on behalf of Defendants The Litigation Practice Group, PC, Debt Resolution Direct, LLC, Marque Carey, Esquire, Randall Clark, Esquire, Howard Gutman, Esquire, Daniel March, Esquire, Michael Robinson, Esquire, Jayde Trinh, Esquire, Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:22-cv-00917, GAN/1:22-cv-04249, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (Anderson, Matthew) Modified on 12/28/2022 (JC). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTY NAMES |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( #3 in MDL No. 3065), ( #1 in MDL No. 3065), ( #2 in MDL No. 3065) Filed by Eric Donald Coleman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kenneth Topp, #et al.Beverly A Graham, Johnny W. Rizo #[Suppress List] Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( #3 in MDL No. 3065), ( #1 in MDL No. 3065), ( #2 in MDL No. 3065) Filed by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Plaintiffs Kenneth Topp, #et al.Beverly A Graham, Johnny W. Rizo #[Suppress List] Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 4 HEARING ORDER re: pldg. ( #1 in MDL No. 3065) - SECTION A (DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT) PANEL HEARING set for 1/26/2023 in Miami, Florida font>. Notices of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument due on or before 1/3/2023.#Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument form (JPML form 9) can be downloaded from our website.Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell, Chair, PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, on 12/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Courthouse Advisory) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:22-cv-00917, GAN/1:22-cv-04249, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (RH) |
Filing 3 ***TEXT ONLY NOTICE***THIS MATTER WILL BE SET FOR THE JANUARY 26, 2023 HEARING SESSION. PURSUANT TO RULE 6.1(e), NOTICE OF FILING AND PUBLICATION OF REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE re: pldg. (2 in CAC/2:22-cv-07915, 2 in CAE/2:22-cv-01959, 2 in GAN/1:22-cv-00917, 2 in GAN/1:22-cv-04249, 2 in KS/5:22-ap-07015, 5 in MDL No. 3065, 2 in MSS/1:22-cv-00057, 2 in OHN/3:22-cv-02093, 2 in OHN/3:22-cv-02094, 2 in OHS/3:22-cv-00342, 2 in PAM/3:22-cv-00707, 2 in TXW/6:22-cv-00814), ( #1 in MDL No. 3065) REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS SET AS FOLLOWS: Reply, if any, due on or before 1/9/2023, and is limited to 10 pages b>.No extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 12/12/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:22-cv-00917, GAN/1:22-cv-04249, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (dld) |
Filing 2 ***TEXT ONLY NOTICE***NOTICE OF FILING AND PUBLICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE re: pldg. ( 1 in MDL No. 3065) BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS SET AS FOLLOWS: Notices of Appearance due on or before 12/27/2022. Corporate Disclosure Statements due on or before 12/27/2022. Responses due on or before 1/3/2023. Reply, if any, due on or before 1/10/2023. In their briefs, the parties should address what steps they have taken to pursue alternatives to centralization (including, but not limited to, engaging in informal coordination of discovery and scheduling, and seeking Section 1404 transfer of one or more of the subject cases). #Appearance forms (JPML form 18) and #Corporate Disclosure forms can be downloaded from our website. Important: A Corporate Disclosure Form, if required, must be filed, even if one has previously been filed in this MDL.Please visit the #CM/ECF Filing Guidelines & Forms page of our website for additional information.Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 12/9/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3065, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:22-cv-00917, GAN/1:22-cv-04249, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (CT) EDITED REPLY DATE Modified on 12/9/2022 (CT). Modified on 12/9/2022 (CT). |
Filing 1 MDL Number 3065 Assigned -- MOTION FOR TRANSFER ACCEPTED FOR FILING re: pldg. ( #1 in Pending No. 122) Associated Cases: Pending No. 122, CAC/2:22-cv-07915, CAE/2:22-cv-01959, GAN/1:2 2-cv-00917, GAN/1:22-cv-04249, KS/5:22-ap-07015, MSS/1:22-cv-00057, OHN/3:22-cv-02093, OHN/3:22-cv-02094, OHS/3:22-cv-00342, PAM/3:22-cv-00707, TXW/6:22-cv-00814 (CT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.