LS 354 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
LS 354 and Jane Doe LS 354 |
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC |
CAN/3:23-CV-04387 |
August 25, 2023 |
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
Sallie Kim |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( #1 in MDL No. 3084), ( #2 in MDL No. 3084) Filed by Robert A Atkins on behalf of Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions, #2 Proof of Service) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3084 et al. (Atkins, Robert) Modified on 9/27/2023 (TF). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTIES. |
Filing 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMENDED) re: pldg. ( #89 in MDL No. 3084) Filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe LS 158, #et al.Jane Doe LS 259, Jane Doe LS 164, Jane Doe LS 203, Jane Doe LS 144, Jane Do e LS 37, Jane Doe LS 91, Jane Doe LS 231, Jane Doe LS 354, Jane Doe LS 293, Jane Doe LS 249, Jane Doe LS 63, Jane Doe LS 67, Jane Doe LS 238, Jane Doe LS 155, Jane Doe LS 159 #[Suppress List] -- Associated Cases: MDL No. 3084, CAN/3:23-cv-04012, CAN/3:23-cv-04366, CAN/3:23-cv-04368, CAN/3:23-cv-04369, CAN/3:23-cv-04370, CAN/3:23-cv-04371, CAN/3:23-cv-04372, CAN/3:23-cv-04373, CAN/3:23-cv-04374, CAN/3:23-cv-04385, CAN/3:23-cv-04387, CAN/3:23-cv-04388, CAN/4:23-cv-04364, CAN/4:23-cv-04365, CAN/4:23-cv-04367, CAN/4:23-cv-04393 (Levin, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.