Meneese v. Exactech, Inc. et al
| Meneese and Debra Meneese |
| Exactech, Inc, Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US Inc. |
| MOE/4:22-CV-00546 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
| Stephen R Welby |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: pldg. ( #19 in MDL No. 3044) Filed by Plaintiff Debra Meneese -- Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044, MOE/4:22-cv-00546 (Burger, Gary) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT re: pldg. ( 1 in MDL No. 3044) -- Identifying Corporate Parent Exactech, Inc., Other Affiliate TPG, Inc. for EXACTECH, US, INC. (Attachments: #1 Other Case List, #2 Proof of Service) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044, CO/1:22-cv-00919, CT/3:22-cv-00682, MD/1:22-cv-00615, MD/1:22-cv-01026, MD/1:22-cv-01027, MD/1:22-cv-01206, MOE/4:22-cv-00546, NJ/2:22-cv-02967, NJ/3:22-cv-02938, NYE/1:22-cv-01974, NYE/1:22-cv-01978, NYE/1:22-cv-03158, NYE/2:22-cv-02633, NYE/2:22-cv-03455, NYE/2:22-cv-03456, NYS/1:22-cv-01994, NYS/1:22-cv-02086, NYS/1:22-cv-04183, NYS/1:22-cv-04885, SC/3:22-cv-01231, SC/3:22-cv-01236, TXN/3:22-cv-00880 (Schmid, Kim) Modified on 6/30/2022 (TF). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTIES. |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT re: pldg. ( 1 in MDL No. 3044) -- Identifying Corporate Parent Osteon Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate TPG, Inc. for EXACTECH, INC. (Attachments: #1 Other Case List, #2 Proof of Service) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044 et al. (Schmid, Kim) Modified on 6/30/2022 (TF). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTIES. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( 1 in MDL No. 3044) Filed by Kim Schmid on behalf of Defendants EXACTECH, INC., EXACTECH U.S., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Other List of Cases, #2 Proof of Service) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044 et al. (Schmid, Kim) Modified on 6/30/2022 (TF). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTIES. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE re: pldg.( #1 in MDL No. 3044) Filed by Gary K Burger on behalf of Plaintiff Debra Meneese Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044, MOE/4:22-cv-00546 (Burger, Gary) |
| Filing 4 ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY***MINUTE ORDER (re: pldg. ( #4 in MDL No. 3044) ) -- Motion of: Defendants Exactech, Inc., et al. for Extension of Time to File Response -- GRANTED TO ALL PARTIES. Responses due on or before 7/20/2022. Reply, if any, due on or before 7/27/2022. No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 6/27/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044, ARE/4:22-cv-00136, CO/1:22-cv-00919, CT/3:22-cv-00682, LAE/2:22-cv-01410, MD/1:22-cv-00615, MD/1:22-cv-01026, MD/1:22-cv-01027, MD/1:22-cv-01206, MOE/4:22-cv-00546, NJ/2:22-cv-02967, NJ/3:22-cv-02938, NYE/1:22-cv-01974, NYE/1:22-cv-01978, NYE/1:22-cv-03158, NYE/2:22-cv-00351, NYE/2:22-cv-02633, NYE/2:22-cv-03455, NYE/2:22-cv-03456, NYS/1:21-cv-06231, NYS/1:22-cv-01994, NYS/1:22-cv-02086, NYS/1:22-cv-02134, NYS/1:22-cv-04183, NYS/1:22-cv-04885, SC/3:22-cv-01231, SC/3:22-cv-01236, TXN/3:22-cv-00880 (JN) |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE re: pldg. ( 1 in MDL No. 3044) Filed by Kim Schmid on behalf of Defendants EXACTECH, INC. and Exactech U.S., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Actions, #2 Exhibit A - Newly-Filed Cases, #3 Proof of Service) Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044 et al. (Schmid, Kim) Modified on 6/27/2022 (TF). REMOVED DUPLICATE PARTIES. |
| Filing 2 ***TEXT ONLY NOTICE***NOTICE OF FILING AND PUBLICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE re: pldg. ( #1 in MDL No. 3044) BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS SET AS FOLLOWS:< br< Notices of Appearance due on or before 6/29/2022. Corporate Disclosure Statements due on or before 6/29/2022. Responses due on or before 7/6/2022. Reply, if any, due on or before 7/13/2022. In their briefs, the parties should address what steps they have taken to pursue alternatives to centralization (including, but not limited to, engaging in informal coordination of discovery and scheduling, and seeking Section 1404 transfer of one or more of the subject cases). #Appearance forms (JPML form 18) and #Corporate Disclosure forms can be downloaded from our website. Important: A Corporate Disclosure Form, if required, must be filed, even if one has previously been filed in this MDL.Please visit the #CM/ECF Filing Guidelines < Forms page of our website for additional information.Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 6/15/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044, ARE/4:22-cv-00136, CO/1:22-cv-00919, CT/3:22-cv-00682, LAE/2:22-cv-01410, MD/1:22-cv-00615, MD/1:22-cv-01026, MD/1:22-cv-01027, MD/1:22-cv-01206, MOE/4:22-cv-00546, NJ/2:22-cv-02967, NJ/3:22-cv-02938, NYE/1:22-cv-01974, NYE/1:22-cv-01978, NYE/1:22-cv-03158, NYE/2:22-cv-00351, NYE/2:22-cv-02633, NYE/2:22-cv-03455, NYE/2:22-cv-03456, NYS/1:21-cv-06231, NYS/1:22-cv-01994, NYS/1:22-cv-02086, NYS/1:22-cv-02134, NYS/1:22-cv-04183, NYS/1:22-cv-04885, SC/3:22-cv-01231, SC/3:22-cv-01236, TXN/3:22-cv-00880 (LH) |
| Filing 1 MDL Number 3044 Assigned -- MOTION FOR TRANSFER ACCEPTED FOR FILING re: pldg. ( #1 in Pending No. 91) Associated Cases: Pending No. 91, ARE/4:22-cv-00136, CO/1:22-cv-00919, CT/3:22-cv -00682, LAE/2:22-cv-01410, MD/1:22-cv-00615, MD/1:22-cv-01026, MD/1:22-cv-01027, MD/1:22-cv-01206, MOE/4:22-cv-00546, NJ/2:22-cv-02967, NJ/3:22-cv-02938, NYE/1:22-cv-01974, NYE/1:22-cv-01978, NYE/1:22-cv-03158, NYE/2:22-cv-00351, NYE/2:22-cv-02633, NYE/2:22-cv-03455, NYE/2:22-cv-03456, NYS/1:21-cv-06231, NYS/1:22-cv-01994, NYS/1:22-cv-02086, NYS/1:22-cv-02134, NYS/1:22-cv-04183, NYS/1:22-cv-04885, SC/3:22-cv-01231, SC/3:22-cv-01236, TXN/3:22-cv-00880 (LH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
