Dameron v. McKesson Corporation et al
Dameron, B. R. Dameron and Christy Dameron |
McKesson Corporation, Miami-Luken, Inc., SpecGx LLC, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., H.D. Smith LLC, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, KVK-Tech, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
WVS/5:20-CV-00492 |
July 20, 2020 |
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
David A Faber |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-166) - 2 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in LAM/3:20-cv-00459, #8102 in MDL No. 2804, 1 in WVS/5:20-cv-00492) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 7/31/2020. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2804, LAM/3:20-cv-00459, WVS/5:20-cv-00492 (SM) |
Filing 2 ***TEXT ONLY NOTICE***NOTICE OF FILING OF CTO AND PUBLICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE (CTO-166) re: pldg. (1 in LAM/3:20-cv-00459, #8102 in MDL No. 2804, 1 in WVS/5:20-cv-00492) BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS SET AS FOLLOWS: Oppositions due on or before 7/30/2020. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 7/23/2020. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2804, LAM/3:20-cv-00459, WVS/5:20-cv-00492 (SM) |
Filing 1 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FILED TODAY (CTO-166) - 2 action(s) Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 7/23/2020. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2804, LAM/3:20-cv-00459, WVS/5:20-cv-00492 (SM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.