Jimmy Kirksey vs. Jackie Crawford, et al (DEATH PENALTY)
| 2:1997cv00333 |
| March 21, 1997 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
231
ORDER that 177 Fourth Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER Denying 209 Motion for Reconsideration. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which this order is entered within which to file their answer to petitioner's remaining claims. In all other respects, the scheduling of this matter is governed by the order entered on July 20, 2010 (ECF No. 181 ). Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 193 Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims Contained Within Petitioner's Fourth Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. FURTHER ORDERED that 204 Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED. FURTHER O RDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which this order is entered within which to file their answer to petitioner's remaining claims. In all other respects, the scheduling of this matter is governed by the order entered on July 20, 2010 (ECF No. 181). Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/26/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER Denying 196 Motion to Strike. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date this order is entered within which to file and serve a response to 193 MOTION to Dismiss. The scheduling of this matter is governed by the 181 scheduling order entered on 7/20/2010. Clerk of the Court shall substitute Renee Baker for E.K. McDaniel. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER that respondents Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, or Alternatively to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance Pending Resentencing of Petitioner 182 is DENIED. Respondents shall have 60 (sixty) days from the date this order is ente red within which to file and serve an answer to petitioners amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 177 . Petitioners motion for evidentiary hearing 187 is DENIED without prejudice to petitioner bringing such motion concurrently with, but separ ate from, his reply to respondents answer. In all other respects, the scheduling of this matter is governed by the scheduling order entered on 7/20/10 181 . Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/23/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER Setting Answer and Reply Deadlines re: 177 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answer due 9/30/2010. Replies due by 11/14/2010. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jimmy Kirksey vs. Jackie Crawford, et al (DEATH PENALTY) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
