John Oliver Snow vs E.K. McDaniel, et al (DEATH PENALTY)
Case Number: 2:2003cv00292
Filed: March 13, 2003
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDERED that the judgment entered September 28, 2015 (ECF No. 202 ) is vacated. It is further ordered that this action is dismissed, as moot, on account of the Petitioner's death. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to transmit a copy of this order and the resulting judgment to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Ad hoc email (NEF) sent to USCA at cmecf_ca9central@ca9.uscourts.gov on 3/30/2021.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDERED that Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 231 ) is granted. Respondents will have until and including March 5, 2021, to file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered October 21, 2020 (ECF No. 225 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDERED that Respondents motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 228 ) is granted. Respondents will have until and including March 1, 2021, to file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered October 21, 2020 (ECF No. 225 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 227 ORDER granting ECF No. 226 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including February 18, 2021, to file their Answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered October 21, 2020 (ECF No. 225 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER directing Respondents to answer ECF No. 137 Second Amended Petition within 90 days. Petitioner to reply within 60 days of answer. Respondents to respond to reply within 45 days thereafter. (See order for details re discovery and evidentiary hearing.) Clerk is directed to update docket substituting William Gittere for Timothy Filson. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Petitioner's ECF No. 217 Motion for Clarification (see order for details); directing Clerk to substitute Timothy Filson for Renee Baker on the docket. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 208 ORDER Granting 203 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. It is further ordered the Clerk of the Court shall separately file petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER: Respondents must file with 10 days of this order, as exhibits, copies of the transcripts of the jury selection. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/8/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER Denying 174 Petitioner's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall have until 1/31/2014, to file an answer responding to the remaining claims in 137 Petitioner's Second Amended Habeas Corpus Petition. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the 135 Order shall remain. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/05/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 146 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss and Denying 159 Petitioner's Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an answer within 90 days, responding to the remaining claims in 137 Petitioner's Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 09/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER setting litigation schedule. Amended Petition deadline: 3/9/2012. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/27/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER Granting 132 Petitioner's Motion to Lift Stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Telephonic Status Conference is set for 1/26/2012 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall substitute Renee Baker for E.K. McDamiel on the docket. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/4/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Oliver Snow vs E.K. McDaniel, et al (DEATH PENALTY)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?