Blake A. Field VS Google, Inc., Featured Case

Plaintiff Blake A. Field sued defendant Google, Inc. for copyright infringement. Plaintiff posted his copyrighted works on his website and completed an online form to request that Google index his website. Plaintiff now asserts that allowing users to view Google\'s cache of his copyrighted works infringes on his copyrights.

Plaintiff: Blake A. Field
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2004cv00413
Filed: April 6, 2004
Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Las Vegas Office
County: Clark
Referring Judge: George W Foley
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 17:101 et
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2006 71
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. Fees awarded to Google against Field. Counterclaims dismissed. Signed by Clerk Lance S Wilson on 2/22/06. (AXM, )
February 14, 2006 68
Submission of PROPOSED ORDER filed by Defendant Google, Inc.. [Proposed] Order Directing the Clerk to Enter Judgment in Favor of Google Inc. Re: Attorney's Fees & Dismissing Without Prejudice Google Inc.'s Counterclaims (Kramer, David)
January 26, 2006 66
STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Directing the Clerk to Enter Judgment in Favor of Google Inc. Re: Attorney's Fees & Dismissing Without Prejudice Google Inc.'s Counterclaims by Defendant Google, Inc.. (Kramer, David)
January 19, 2006 65
JUDGMENT for Defendant's motion for summary judgment 51. Signed by Lance S Wilson on 1/19/06. (AXM, )
January 9, 2006 63
Submission of PROPOSED ORDER filed by Defendant Google, Inc.. [Proposed] Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law & [Proposed] Order (Kramer, David)
November 28, 2005 Opinion or Order 60
ORDER granting 59 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael B. Levin for Google, Inc. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/28/05. (AAB)
November 9, 2005 58
DECLARATION of Alexander MacGillivray re 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment; filed by Defendant Google, Inc.. (AXM, )
November 8, 2005 55
MEMORANDUM filed by Defendant Google, Inc. re 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # (1) # (2))(AXM, )
November 7, 2005 52
DECLARATION re 51 of Wiliam O'Callaghan to MOTION for Summary Judgment; by Defendant Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) # (2) # (3))(AXM, )
November 1, 2005 50
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION to mtn for S/J (snt back 10/21/05 see doc #47) obo P (m)
October 31, 2005 49
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION in supt of mtn for S/J (#43) obo D (m)
October 21, 2005 Opinion or Order 47
ORDER ORD mtn for lv to file mtn for S/J rcvd 9/27/05 in excess of 30 pgs is GRANTED for 45 pgs ONLY; mtn is in excess of 45 pgs snt back to D; (see doc). cpys dist.
October 17, 2005 48
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to mtn for S/J (snt back to D see order #47) rcvd on 9/27/05 obo P (m)
October 10, 2005 45
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to mtn for S/J (#43) obo D (m)
September 30, 2005 44
KLINGELE ORDER ORD oppo due 15dys; reply due 11dys; (see doc). cpys dist.
September 23, 2005 42
MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF for lv to file a S/J brief in excess of 30 pgs obo D (m) (DISPO: GRANTED #47;
August 12, 2005 Opinion or Order 41
ORDER that action is reasgn to GWF for all further proceedings as mag judge. (cps dist)
August 8, 2005 Opinion or Order 40
ORDER that hrg on Plf's req to take judicial ntc (#32) is vacated. (cps dist)
August 5, 2005 Opinion or Order 39
ORDER ON STIPULATION Req that the Court vacate oral argument sched for 8/8/05. (cps dist)
August 4, 2005 37
NOTICE OF HEARING Rescheduled mtn to take judicial notice of cert. of copyrights #32 for 8/29/05 @ 10:00am. cps dist.
July 12, 2005 Opinion or Order 36
ORDER (Amd) that hrg on mtn to take judicial ntc (#32) is sched for 8/8/05 @ 10 am. (cps dist)
July 5, 2005 35
NOTICE (OTHER) by Dft of non-oppo to mtn (#32). (s)
June 30, 2005 34
NOTICE OF HEARING O/A on mtn/req to take judicial ntc of cert of copy registration (#32) sked for 10/25/05 @9am bfr RCJ.cpys dist.
June 27, 2005 Opinion or Order 33
ORDER ORD: Mtn ext #28 is Denied as moot. cps dist.
June 15, 2005 32
MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF to take judicial ntc of cpyright registration obo P (m) (FLD SEP) (DIPSO:ntc #34; ntc #35
June 14, 2005 30
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION in supt of mtn to ext disc (#28) obo D (m)
June 1, 2005 29
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to mtn to ext disc (#28) obo P (m)
May 19, 2005 28
MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF to ext disc obo D (m) (DISPO: oppo #29; reply #30; ORD #33 Denied as moot.
May 18, 2005 Opinion or Order 27
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORD PTO is GRANTED, (see doc). cpys dist.
April 13, 2005 Opinion or Order 26
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORD ext of time for disc to complete depos to 5/20//05 is GRANTED, (see doc). cpys dist.
January 28, 2005 Opinion or Order 25
ORDER ORD DISC due 7/15/05; MTNS due 8/16/05; JTPTO due 9/16/05, (see doc). cpys dist.
December 30, 2004 24
NOTICE (OTHER) judicial ntc of copyright registration obo P (m)
December 14, 2004 23
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT to cntr claims obo P (m)
December 13, 2004 Opinion or Order 22
ORDER ORD stip disc plan/sked ord to be filed nlt 12/29/04. cpys dist.
December 2, 2004 21
MISCELLANEOUS HEARING dtd 11/15/04 Crt Recorder Lilia Abarca De Carter re mtn to strike (#13) mtn shl be GRANTED, ( see doc). cpys dist.
November 24, 2004 Opinion or Order 20
ORDER ORD mtn to strike (#13) is DENIED, ( see doc). cpys dist.
October 22, 2004 Opinion or Order 19
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORD con't O/A on mtn to strike (#13) to 11/15/04 is GRANTED. (see doc) cpys dist.
September 30, 2004 18
NOTICE OF HEARING O/A on mtn to strike cntrclaims & portions of Ds answer (#13) set for 10/25/04 @9am bfr RCJ crtrm 7D. cpys dist.
September 21, 2004 17
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION in supt of mtn to strike (#13) obo P (m)
September 7, 2004 16
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to mt to strike (#13) obo D (m)
August 26, 2004 Opinion or Order 15
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORD ext of time to file oppo to mtn to strike cntrclaims and portions of answer(#13) to 9/06/04 is GRANTED. cpys dist.
August 17, 2004 14
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES obo P (m) (cpy RCJ/LRL)
July 27, 2004 13
MOTION TO STRIKE Hrng req to strike Ds cntrclm and portions of Ds answ. obo P. (m) (DISPO:oppo #16; reply #17; GRANTED #20/#21;
July 7, 2004 Opinion or Order 12
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORD deadline for P to ans/resp to Ds cntrclaim is ext to 7/27/04. cpys dist.
June 29, 2004 9
DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL obo Kelly A. Evans, local cnsl for D. (William O'Callaghan) cpys dist.
June 25, 2004 8
VERIFIED PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE of William M. O'Callaghan (petnr) as out/state cnsl for D. cpys dist.
June 14, 2004 7
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT w/JD obo D (m)
May 25, 2004 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT w/JD obo P
May 21, 2004 Opinion or Order 4
ORDER ON STIPULATION ORDER deadline for Ds to rspnd to Ps cmplt ext to 6/7/04. cpys dist.
May 4, 2004 3
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED as to D by serv Michael Kwon on 4/28/04
April 6, 2004 2
COPYRIGHT #279 Report on the filing of an actn re a copyright

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blake A. Field VS Google, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Represented By: William O'Callaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blake A. Field
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?