Jessica Williams VS Chirstine Bodo, etal
Case Number: 2:2004cv01620
Filed: November 22, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 110 the petition, as amended, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. The Clerk further shall provide a copy of this order and the judgment to the Clerk of the Eighth Judicial District Court, in connection with that court's No. 00C166483. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: State Court - MR)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 119 respondents' motion for reconsideration of the courts order on motion to dismiss is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 117 respondents' motion to extend time to file an answer and 128 first, 130 second, and 131 third motions to extend time to file a reply in support of the motion for reconsideration are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 120 , 122 , 123 , 125 petitioner's four (4) motions for extens ion of time to file a response to a motion for reconsideration and a reply in support of the petition are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 113 respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 112 respondents' motion for extension of time to file a response to the amended petition is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 97 petitioner's motion to lift stay is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as the stay is lifted by this order, the Clerk shall REOPEN THE FILE in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 109 petitioner&# 039;s motion for leave to file an amended petition is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the supplemental exhibits filed at 98 to 102 , 106 , and 108 are ACCEPTED as supplemental exhibits to the amended petition 110 . The Clerk of Cour t SHALL LINK the supplemental exhibits 98 to 102 , 106 , and 108 to the amended petition 110 on the CM/ECF docket in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days following the date of entry of thi s order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended petition 110 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties SHALL SEND courtesy copies of all exhibits to the Reno Division of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner& #039;s motion for leave to file supplemental authorities in support of ground 8 and motion for extension of time 103 and 105 are both DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL STRIKE 107 petitioner's memorandum in supp ort of ground 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 104 petitioner's motion to partially waive local rules is GRANTED as set forth in this order. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDERED that petitioner's motion 89 for a stay and abeyance is GRANTED and this this action is STAYED pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims. See Order for details. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER Granting 87 Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond re 86 Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis; Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, and the time for petitioner to file a respon se to the prior order (#86) is extended up to and including 3/1/11. Given the time remaining prior to 3/31/11, respondents may respond thereto by 3/18/11, and petitioner may file a reply thereto by 3/25/11. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 2/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER Granting 83 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Ellen J. Bezian and John G. Watkins; Granting 84 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner, with Lori C. Teicher, Esq., and Mich ael Pescetta, Esq., appearing as petitioner's counsel of record; Denying without prejudice as unnecessary at this juncture 80 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 85 Amended Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperi s. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have 30 days from entry of this order within which to respond to the prior show cause order (#78) and/or to seek other appropriate relief. Respondents may respond thereto within 30 days of service. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF and to CJA Coordinator - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jessica Williams VS Chirstine Bodo, etal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?