Jamaar Jerome Williams v. Jackie Crawford, et al
Case Number: |
2:2005cv00879 |
Filed: |
July 20, 2005 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Las Vegas Office |
Presiding Judge: |
George W Foley |
Presiding Judge: |
Philip M. Pro |
Nature of Suit: |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 20, 2017 |
Filing
115
ORDER that Grounds Two and Three (a-c) of the 36 Amended Petition are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
November 17, 2016 |
Filing
103
ORDER that Petitioner shall have 01/16/2017 to submit points and authorities and to proffer any evidence in support his claims under Martinez. Respondents shall have 45 days to respond to Petitioners submission. Petitioner shall have 30 days to file a reply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
August 11, 2014 |
Filing
94
ORDER that Petitioner's 36 Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is Denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is Denied. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
November 29, 2012 |
Filing
92
ORDER Granting 91 Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply to Respondent's Answer. Replies due by 12/26/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/29/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
October 11, 2012 |
Filing
90
ORDER Denying 89 Motion to Dismiss. The court construes the motion to dismiss as respondents answer, and petitioner shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve a reply. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
August 13, 2012 |
Filing
88
ORDER Granting in part 72 Motion to Dismiss. Grounds 2, 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c) of the second amended petition 36 are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve an answer. Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
December 23, 2011 |
Filing
81
ORDER Granting 79 Second MOTION to Extend Time to File Reply to 72 Second MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jackie Crawford. Reply due by 1/24/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
November 8, 2011 |
Filing
76
ORDER Granting 73 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re 72 Second MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jackie Crawford. Respondents shall have 7 days from the date of entry of this order to file a reply. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
July 25, 2011 |
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 67 Motion to Reopen Case. This action is REINSTATED. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date this order is entered to answer/respond to 36 the second amended petition. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?