Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Mendez
Case Number: 2:2005cv01417
Filed: December 1, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER FOR DESTRUCTION OF EXHIBITS The Clerk's Office having given notice to counsel as prescribed by LR 79-1 and LCR 55-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of this Court, and counsel having failed to make arrangements to retrieve the exhibits in the allotted time, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is authorized to destroy the exhibits previously admitted in this matter. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 167 Motion to Strike Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 162 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Granting 168 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Westchester Fire Insurance Company and against Phil Mendez, doing business as Professional Aircraft Line Service. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?