Kaufman v. Unum Life Insurance Company et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Kaufman v. Unum Life Insurance Company et al

Kaufman v. Unum Life Insurance Company et al

Case Number:	2:2006cv00621
Filed:	May 18, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence R. Leavitt
Presiding Judge:	Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 18, 2011	Filing 77 ORDER that Unums motion for summary judgment 55 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART on the basis that while Unum is entitled to summary judgment on Kaufmans claims for declaratory relief and breach of the employee benefit plan, Unum is not entit led to summary judgment on its counterclaims for equitable restitution pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), unjust enrichment, and constructive trust. Kaufmans cross-motion for summary judgment 64 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART on the ba sis that while Kaufman is entitled to summary judgment on Unums counterclaims, he is not entitled to summary judgment on Kaufmans claims. Clerk to enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
June 1, 2010	Filing 53 ORDER Granting 47 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Kaufman to the following extent: Discovery shall be reopened until 7/16/2010. Plaintiff shall pay counsel for defendant, not later than 8/2/10, the sum of $1,000 as the reasonable attorney's fees incurred in making this motion for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 6/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 18, 2011

Filing 77 ORDER that Unums motion for summary judgment 55 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART on the basis that while Unum is entitled to summary judgment on Kaufmans claims for declaratory relief and breach of the employee benefit plan, Unum is not entit led to summary judgment on its counterclaims for equitable restitution pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), unjust enrichment, and constructive trust. Kaufmans cross-motion for summary judgment 64 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART on the ba sis that while Kaufman is entitled to summary judgment on Unums counterclaims, he is not entitled to summary judgment on Kaufmans claims. Clerk to enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

June 1, 2010

Filing 53 ORDER Granting 47 Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff Kaufman to the following extent: Discovery shall be reopened until 7/16/2010. Plaintiff shall pay counsel for defendant, not later than 8/2/10, the sum of $1,000 as the reasonable attorney's fees incurred in making this motion for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 6/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaufman v. Unum Life Insurance Company et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?