Lanahan v. Clark County
2:2006cv01176 |
September 21, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Larry R. Hicks |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER granting 54 defendant's Motion in Limine. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/2/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 43 ORDER approving nunc pro tunc 42 parties' Stipulation to file their joint pretrial Order by 4/15/2009. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/2/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 41 ORDER approving 40 parties' Stipulation to file their Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 4/1/2009. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/20/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall lodge their Proposed Joint Pretrial Order within 30 days from entry of this order. See order re specifics. (Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/18/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/17/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lanahan v. Clark County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.