Boudoin v. Transportation Security Administration, et al.
| Gladys E. Boudoin |
| United Airlines and Transportation Security Administration |
| 2:2007cv00019 |
| January 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| George W Foley |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER adopting Finding and Recommendations. The Plaintiff's letter requesting that her case not be dismissed 12 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall DISMISS this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/30/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss This Action Without Prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 3/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge George W Foley, Jr on 3/11/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER granting 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gladys E. Boudoin. Clerk shall filed the Complaint. Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 3/1/2007. Copy of complaint form with instructions sent to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge George W Foley Jr. on 1/23/07. (AAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
