American International Recovery, Inc., v. Randolph Jack Garrett, et al
Plaintiff: Production Resource Group, LLC and American International Recovery
Defendant: Grace Audio Technologies, Inc., Pilar Costa and Randolph Jack Garrett
Case Number: 2:2007cv00123
Filed: January 30, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER that Plaintiff's Affidavit of Renewal of Default Judgment 76 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/8/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER Granting 72 Motion to Withdraw 67 Order on 66 Motion for an Order to Show Cause. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/15/2011 is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/31/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
October 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER Granting 62 Motion for Writ of Attachment. Counsel shall submit a proposed Writ of Attachment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER that Defendant Randolph Jack Garrett shall appear on November 15, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Granting 66 Motion Requesting Ruling on Pending Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American International Recovery, Inc., v. Randolph Jack Garrett, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grace Audio Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Richard D Ackerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pilar Costa
Represented By: Richard D Ackerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randolph Jack Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Production Resource Group, LLC
Represented By: James E. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American International Recovery
Represented By: James E. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?