American International Recovery, Inc., v. Randolph Jack Garrett, et al
Production Resource Group, LLC and American International Recovery |
Grace Audio Technologies, Inc., Pilar Costa and Randolph Jack Garrett |
2:2007cv00123 |
January 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Clark |
Peggy A. Leen |
James C. Mahan |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER that Plaintiff's Affidavit of Renewal of Default Judgment 76 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/8/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 73 ORDER Granting 72 Motion to Withdraw 67 Order on 66 Motion for an Order to Show Cause. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/15/2011 is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/31/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 68 ORDER Granting 62 Motion for Writ of Attachment. Counsel shall submit a proposed Writ of Attachment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 67 ORDER that Defendant Randolph Jack Garrett shall appear on November 15, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Granting 66 Motion Requesting Ruling on Pending Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.