Bibby v. State Of Nevada et al
| Clyde Steven Bibby |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State Of Nevada |
| 2:2007cv00140 |
| February 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 25 respondents' Motion for More Definite Statement; and denying as moot 26 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order, respondents SHALL F ILE an answer to the amended petition 18 , addressing all substantive and procedural grounds that they wish the Court to consider. No further motions to dismiss will be entertained. In filing the answer, respondents shall comply with the requireme nts of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file his reply to the answer, if any, no later than thirty (30) days after being served with the answer.( Responses due by 6/26/2009.) See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/27/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
