Cumplido v. Crawford et al
Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
Gustavo Aroamda Cumplido |
Jackie Crawford and Brian Williams |
2:2007cv00580 |
May 2, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
Philip M. Pro |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDERED that petitioner's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 40) to file the reply is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to strike (ECF No. 43) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus i s DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 36 ORDER Setting Answer Deadline. Respondents answer due 10/22/2010. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 34 ORDER that respondents motion to dismiss 28 for failure to exhaust is GRANTED, as follows: Grounds 1 and 13(b) of the petition are exhausted. All other grounds of the petition are unexhausted. Petitioner shall advise Court within 20 days of how petitioner will proceed. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/31/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.