Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Maragaret Picus |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Menu Foods, Inc., Del Monte Foods Company, Sunshine Mills, Inc. and Chemnutra, Inc. |
| 2:2007cv00682 |
| May 25, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 46 NOTICE of Change of Address by Nicholas M Wieczorek. (Wieczorek, Nicholas) |
| Filing 45 NOTICE by Plaintiff Maragaret Picus of Change of Firm Name (Gerard, Robert) |
| Filing 44 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF RECENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by Defendant Del Monte Foods Company. (Salerno, Nicholas) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE by Plaintiff Maragaret Picus re 18 MOTION to Dismiss, 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. Notice of New and Supplemental Authority Submitted in Opposition to motions to dismiss (Blumenthal, Norman) |
|
|
| Filing 41 REPLY to Response to 38 Emergency MOTION to Stay Proceedings ; filed by Defendant Del Monte Foods Company. (Salerno, Nicholas) |
| Filing 40 RESPONSE to 38 Emergency MOTION to Stay Proceedings ; filed by Plaintiff Maragaret Picus. and certificate of service (Blumenthal, Norman) |
| Filing 38 Emergency MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Defendant Del Monte Foods Company. (Salerno, Nicholas) |
|
|
| Filing 32 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Alan W. Westbrook submitted by attorney Julie L. Schwartz, (Filing fee $ 175 receipt number 641165) by Defendant Menu Foods, Inc.. (Westbrook, Alan) |
|
|
| Filing 29 MDL-1850 COPY BRIEF in support of Motion 28 filed by Defendant Menu Foods, Inc. re 28 Joint Motion to Vacate Conditional Transfer Order. (Filed by Amy W. Schulman) *No Action Required this will be handled by MDL (BLG) |
| Filing 26 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel submitted by attorney Norman Blumenthal, (Filing fee $ 175) by Plaintiff Maragaret Picus. (AXM) |
| Filing 25 JOINDER to 24 Reply to Response to Motion ; of Defendant Menu Foods, Inc. to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Defendant Chemnutra, Inc.. (Wieczorek, Nicholas) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to 18 MOTION to Dismiss ; filed by Defendant Menu Foods, Inc.. (Westbrook, Alan) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; filed by Plaintiff Maragaret Picus. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT DEL MONTE CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT Replies due by 7/19/2007. (Osuch, Lawrence) |
| Filing 17 STATUS REPORT Joint by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Boschee, Brian) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kurt R. Bonds on behalf of Defendant Sunshine Mills, Inc.. (Bonds, Kurt) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by Defendant Del Monte Foods Company. Responses due by 7/9/2007. (Grossman, Dawn) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and Order to Consolidate Cases by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Boschee, Brian) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT of Case by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Boschee, Brian) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to 5 Notice of Corrected Image/Document; Supplement to Amended Notice or Removal by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Boschee, Brian) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.