Sullivan et al., v. Global Outreach, LLC,. et al.
Plaintiff: |
Patrick Sullivan, Laura Sullivan and Carmen Benedict |
Defendant: |
Global Outreach, LLC, Global Outreach, SA, Anil Kothari and Hemangini Kothari |
Case Number: |
2:2007cv01122 |
Filed: |
August 22, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Las Vegas Office |
County: |
Clark |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert J. Johnston |
Presiding Judge: |
Philip M. Pro |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
Cause of Action: |
12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 21, 2011 |
Filing
146
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Carmen Benedict, Laura Sullivan, and Patrick Sullivan and against Global Outreach, LLC, Anil Kothari, and Hemangini Kothari in the amount of $613,216.96. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/21/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
March 11, 2011 |
Filing
142
ORDER Striking 71 Answer to Amended Complaint. Default Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants. Submission of Proposed Judgment due by 3/21/2011. The prior monetary sanctions of $4,780.00 imposed by the Court shall be included in the judgment submitted by Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
February 24, 2011 |
Filing
136
ORDER Denying 135 Request for a Telephone Conference Call filed by Anil Kothari. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Anil Kothari and Hemangini Kothari must be present on February 28, 2011, in Las Vegas, Nevada for the taking of their depositions as previously ordered by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 2/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
January 26, 2011 |
Filing
128
ORDER Granting 129 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 115 Motion for the Imposition of Terminating Sanctions. Responses due by 2/4/2011. Motion Hearing set for 2/9/2011 11:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. Copy of Order sent to Defendants via Certified Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 1/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
December 7, 2010 |
Filing
117
ORDER RESCHEDULING Settlement Conference for 1/13/2011 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that settlement conference statements shall be submitted on or before 1/6/11. Clerk shall serve a co py of this Order on the Defendants, Anil Kothari and Hemangini Kothari, by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 12/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: defendants by certified mail EDS)
|
September 8, 2010 |
Filing
103
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 69 is GRANTED as to the request to compel discovery responses and to compel party depositions. Plaintiff shall file an affidavit of reasonable costs, including attorneys fees, incurred in bringing the motion by 9/15/10. A response to said affidavit for fees and costs, if any, shall be filed by 9/21/10. A hearing on the Request for Imposition of Sanctions 69 is scheduled for 9/24/10, at 9:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3D, 3d floor, Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Blvd. So., Las Vegas, Nevada. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 9/8/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?