Hixon v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
| Donald Hixon |
| Paul Herman Chaffee and Nevada Department Of Corrections |
| Jeffrey W Messmore, Martin I. Melendrez and A Wayne Carter |
| 2:2007cv01150 |
| August 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice re: 111 Stipulation for Dismissal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDERED that not later than 1/20/12, the parties shall advise the Court in writing as to the status of the settlement reached. Alternatively, should all actions relating to settlement have been accomplished by that date, the parties may file a stipulation for dismissal in lieu of a status report. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDERED that 104 MOTION to Disqualify MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL filed by Donald Hixon, is WITHDRAWN from consideration by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 8/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
