Wilson v. Ayers et al
Curt Wilson |
Liz Ayers, Jean Stephens and Nancy K. Richins |
2:2007cv01283 |
October 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Clark |
Larry R. Hicks |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
None |
Federal Question |
42:2003 Job Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER granting 29 Defendant Ayers's Motion to Dismiss; and granting 30 Defendant Stephens's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint stating colorable claims against Ayers and Stephens. In the event that Plaintiff fails to do so, this case shall be dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. ( Amended Complaint deadline: 2/16/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/14/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 14 defendant Richins's Motion to Dismiss; denying 16 defendant Ayers's Motion to Dismiss; and denying 17 defendant Stephens's Motion to Dismiss. In the event plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint to state a cognizable claim against Richins, he is granted 30 days to do so. ( Amended Complaint deadline: 8/6/2009.) In the event defendants Ayers or Stephens wish to file additional motions, they are granted 30 days to do so. ( Motions due by 8/6/2009.) See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/7/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.