Secalt S.A. et al v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machinery Company, Ltd.
Secalt S.A. and Tractel, Inc. |
Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machinery Company, Ltd. |
2:2008cv00336 |
March 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Clark |
George W Foley |
James C. Mahan |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 205 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machinery Company, Ltd. against Secalt S.A., Tractel, Inc.. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 12/23/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 203 ORDER that plaintiff Seacalt S.A. et al.s objections to the bill of costs and request for the court to strike certain fees 190 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machine Company, Ltd. to file an amended bill of costs. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 180 ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 127 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 145 and Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Dr. Cagan 154 , are DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/17/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 173 ORDER that Motions to Seal 129 , 144 , 150 , 152 , 158 , and 165 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.