Securities and Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| CMKM Diamonds, Inc., 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC, NevWest Securities Corporation, Urban Casavant, John Edwards, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney, Kathleen Tomasso, Anthony Tomasso, Helen Bagley, Daryl Anderson, Sergey Rumyantsev, Anthony Santos and Brian Dvorak |
| 2:2008cv00437 |
| April 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| Clark |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 15:77 Securities Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
ORDER Granting 229 Plaintiff's Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Attorneys John M. McCoy, III and Molly M White terminated. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 06/05/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER Granting 208 Motion for Leave to Appear for Attorney Gary Y. Leung for Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER Granting 211 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Global Stock Transfer, LLC and Helen Bagley. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
185
JUDGMENT in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission and against 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC, Brian Dvorak, Helen Bagley, and Sergey Rumyantsev. Dvorak shall pay a total of $409,638.11 in disgorgement and interest; Bagley shall pay a tota l of $448,047.87 in disgorgement and interest; Rumyantsev shall pay a total of $48,254.63 in disgorgement and interest. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/1/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, and USDC Finance - SLR)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER Granting 161 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. Plaintiff shall have 10 days from entry of this order to file an appropriate permanent injunction and order of disgorgement. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER that Defendants Motion for Stay of this Civil Proceeding 172 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 4/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER granting 159 Motion for Leave to Appear for Attorney Karen Lynn Matteson for Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 11/11/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER Granting 99 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granting 102 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granting 112 Motion for Summary Judgment. Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for purpose of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Clerk ordered to enter judgment. Commission shall provide the court with a status report every 90 days concerning the satisfaction of the judgment. (see order for details) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AXM)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER APPROVING 108 parties' Stipulation for Defendant Anderson to file his response and Plaintiff its reply to 102 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment against Daryl Anderson. ( Responses due by 1/16/2009; Replies due by 1/27/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/5/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
