Campos et al v. Steen et al
| Kim M. Campos, John Fiato and Barbara Beaucage |
| Paul Steen and Andrus Distributing, Inc. |
| 2:2008cv00748 |
| June 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| Clark |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER Granting 73 Third-party Defendants' Motion to Stay Third-party proceedings pending third-party defendant Rex Wakamatsu's ability to participate in the litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 69 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine is Granted. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/11/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 58 plaintiff's s Motion for Summary Judgment on issue of causation. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 54 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order filed by Doug Andrus Distributing, Inc. See document for details. IT IS ORDERED plaintiffs and defendants shall submit a joint pretr ial order no later than 01/19/2010. Failure to timely to comply with this order will result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/07/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
