Elliot v. Williams et al
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner: Clarence H. Elliot
Respondent: Brian Williams
Case Number: 2:2008cv00829
Filed: June 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 91 Motion to Return $25,000 cash bond posted. The $25,000.00 cash bond shall be exonerated and returned to petitioner Clarence H. Elliot forthwith. Petitioner is released from the supervision of the U.S. Pretrial Services Office. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/7/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance and Pretrial, Jaime Stroup - SLD)
February 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER that the Court expedites the briefing schedule re 91 Petitioner's Motion for Return of $25,000 Cash Bond Posted. Responses due within 5 days. Replies due within 3 days of being served with the response. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 02/05/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER that a hearing is set for 1/26/2012 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston to determine bail and conditions of release. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 1/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF CC: Pretrial Services and USM - SLR)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 50 Petitioner's Motion for Release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 55 Respondents' Motion for Stay is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 45 and 46 are SYATED for 60 days from the date of this order. Upon lift of this stay, within 30 days the Magistrate Judge shall determine bail and conditions of release IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall provide a copy of this order to the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case and to Pretrial Services. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the requirement in the 9/23/11 order to retry petitioner within 30 days is STAYED 90 days after the conclusion of any proceedings seeking appellate or certiorari review, or the expira tion of time for seeking such appeal or review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner is released and the 9/23/11 order is vacated, petitioner shall report to Northern Nevada Correctional Center within 48 hours. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Magistrate Judge Johnston and Pretrial Services - EDS)
October 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that the Courts order of September 23, 2011 45 is STAYED until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/21/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER that Respondents shall file a response to 50 Motion for Release on Personal Recognizance or Bail, or any motion to stay the court's 9/23/11 order, no later than 10/17/11. Petitioner shall file a response to any motions no later than 10/19/11. The Court will entertain no motions for extension of time regarding the above briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Granting federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall be released from custody within 30 days, unless the State files a written election in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the petitioner and against respondents, granting the writ of habeas corpus. Clerk of Court is directed to send, via certified mail, a copy of this order and judgment to the Clerk of the Eighth Judicial District Court. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: 8th Judicial District Court by certified mail #7009 0960 0000 4100 7511 - EDS)
October 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Denying 37 Motion to Dismiss. Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams answer due 10/31/2010. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/1/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliot v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clarence H. Elliot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?