Barfield et al v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
James D. Barfield and Marcie Barfield |
Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Aurora Home Loans, American Trust Deed Services Corp. and Title Court Services, Inc. |
2:2008cv01032 |
August 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
Clark |
Robert C. Jones |
Peggy A. Leen |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER REGARDING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiffs complaint against the only remaining defendant, Title Court Services, Inc., is DISMISSED for their failure to prosecute their claims; failure to respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss 25 ; failure to keep the court advised of their current address; and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause 33 . Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the plaintiffs complaint against the only remaining defendant, Title Court Services, Inc., be dismissed for their failure to prosecute their claims, failure to respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss 25 , failure t o keep the court advised of their current address, andfailure to respond to the Order to Show Cause 33 . Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.