Scott v. Leavitt
Plaintiff: Jesse Scott
Defendant: Michael O. Leavitt
Case Number: 2:2008cv01185
Filed: September 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: George W Foley
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 16:3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 30 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Leavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Scott
Represented By: Cal J. Potter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael O. Leavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?