Dinicola v. West Coast Consulting LLC et al
Richard Dinicola |
West Coast Consulting LLC, Richard Dinicola, Eastridge Infotech Technology, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Brian Borysewich, Internet Reliance Company, Regina Wilson, Beth Borysewich and United Brothrhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America |
2:2008cv01209 |
September 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Clark |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
Brian E. Sandoval |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 188 JUDGMENT that Plaintiff Stephen Lothorien take nothing and defendants, as the prevailing parties, recover their costs. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/4/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 179 ORDER Denying 130 Motion for Reconsideration; Granting in part and Denying as Moot in part 131 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying as Moot in part 132 Motion to Strike; Denying as Moot 134 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 166 MOTION to Extend Time to File an Opposition; Granting 172 Motion to Extend Time to File and Opposition; Granting in part and Denying in part 160 Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting 163 Motion to Set Aside Default of Regina Wilson; filed by Stephen Lothlorien. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/27/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.