Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., v. LaSalle Bank National Association
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| LaSalle Bank National Association |
| 2:2008cv01448 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Clark |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| James C. Mahan |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
ORDER FOR RELEASE OF EXHIBITS. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/27/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 182 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER Denying 197 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER Denying 123 Motion to Strike errata sheet of Timothy Dwyer and for order in liminee. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER Denying 113 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER Denying 110 Motion to Exclude the Expert Report of David Abshier and to Exclude David Abshier's Related Testimony. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER Granting 109 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Purported Experts. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the hearings on the motions for summary judgment (doc. #113 and #114) currently scheduled for January 27, 2011, at 11:00 am, be VACATED and rescheduled for February 24, 2011, at 10:30 am. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER Denying 107 Motion for Leave to Exceed the Page Limit for Its Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant is granted leave to file a motion for summary judgment of up to and including forty (40) pages, exclusive of exhibits. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/14/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., v. LaSalle Bank National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Amanda C Yen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LaSalle Bank National Association | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
