Towbin v. Empire Suzuki et al
Josh Towbin |
Empire Suzuki and Tom Georgalis |
2:2008cv01719 |
December 5, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Contract: Other Office |
Clark |
Roger L. Hunt |
Peggy A. Leen |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accepting and Adopting 37 Report and Recommendation, Granting 34 MOTION for Sanctions re Discovery Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions filed by Josh Towbin. Defendants pleadings are stricken a nd judgment entered on behalf of Plaintiff as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff takejudgment against Defendants Empire Suzuki and Tom Georgalis, and each of them, as follows: As and for payment for work performed: 36;281,500. Plus interest as provided by NRS 99.040. As and for attorneys fees in the amount of $21,263.50. And costs as provided by law. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 3/25/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD) |
Filing 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 34 MOTION for Sanctions re Discovery Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions filed by Josh Towbin. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs 34 Motion for Sanctions be GRANTED and that default judgment be entered against Defendants Empire Suzuki and Tom Georgalis. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2010 Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/19/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.