McCurdy v. Kirkegard et al
| Laurice McCurdy |
| Leroy Kirkegard, Aaron Fisher, Mark Paresi and Kirk Monroe |
| 2:2008cv01742 |
| December 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Clark |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Corrections Corporation of America's 173 Motion for Judgment After Mandate is Granted. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants in the amount of $164.00, in accordance with the 04/03/2015 170 Mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 04/15/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
156
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Unserved Defendants Cooper, Naph Care Inc., Nurse Larry, Unknown Supervisor P#1641, C. Harrison, C/O (FNU) Davis, Mark Paresi, and S. Johnson and against Plaintiff Laurice McCurdy. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 06/04/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal re: 123 Notice of Appeal filed by Laurice McCurdy. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: USCA - ASB)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER Granting 128 Motion for Entry of Judgment as to Corrections Coporation of America. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER Granting 118 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 119 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order Denying Motion for Recusal, and Granting 104 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER Granting 104 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk shall enter Judgment in favor of Defendants Nieman, Alverez, Cobb, and Unknown Supervisor P#1354 and Against Plaintiff McCurdy. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/4/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER Denying 110 Motion for Recusal of District Judge. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
101
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Leroy Kirkegard and against Laurice McCurdy in the amount of $12,325.00. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/14/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER Granting 95 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Laurice McCurdy shall, not later than November 29, 2010, pay to Defendant Leroy Kirkegard the sum of $12,325.00 for attorney fees. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/13/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER that Defendant Deputy United States Marshal Aaron Fishers Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Enter Summary Judgment 68 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting Defendants' 87 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's 83 Traverse. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/3/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER that Plaintiffs Request for an Order Granting Ongoing Assistance of Jailhouse Lawyer is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/19/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Extend Time. The Federal Defendant shall have until 7/22/10 within which time to respond to the Amended Complaint and the 50 motion for miscellaneous relief that was filed by Plaintiff on 6/18/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/23/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting Federal Defendant's 62 Motion to Extend Time. Aaron Fisher answer due 7/21/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/13/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Compliance 21 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs Motion to Include 21 is GRANTED. Clerk of Court to issue Summons to Defendant Nurse Larry, and deliver to the U.S. Marshal for service. Plaintiff has 20 days to send U .S. Marshal the USM-285 form. Service must be accomplished within 120 days from this Order. Plaintiffs claim against Nurse Larry in his official capacity is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, with leave to amend. Plaintiff has 30 days from this Order to file his Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, forms to plaintiff and summons to USM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER that Plaintiff Laurice McCurdys Motion for Extension of Time 47 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have to and including 7/12/10 to Respond to Defendant Leroy Kirkegards Motion to Dismiss 39 and Defendant Corrections Corporation of Americas Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 43 . Plaintiffs Motion to Include Nurse Larry in Service Order 38 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
