Barela v. Walgreen Company, et al.,
| Susan Barela |
| Walgreen, Co., Geri Reveal, Jason Weir, Peter Willis and Holly Lahmon |
| 2:2008cv01817 |
| December 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Clark |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER Granting 95 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Dismissing Defendants Reveal and Weir without Prejudice. Geri Reveal and Jason Weir terminated. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Granting 54 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses or in the Alternative for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories, to the extent that Defendants shall have 15 days in which to serve supplemental answers to interrogatory number 2 with resp ect to affirmative defenses 25 through 29, and to answer, without objection, interrogatories numbered 3 - 12. Plaintiffs request for an additional 13 interrogatories is DENIED Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/4/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
