Wintice Group v. Longleg et al
Plaintiff: Wintice Group
Defendant: Destiny Longleg and Tzar Technologies
Case Number: 2:2008cv01827
Filed: December 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Trademark Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER Granting 142 Stipulation to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/20/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER Granting 140 Stipulated Permanent Injunction. Trial Set for 7/26/2011 and Calendar call set for 7/20/2011 are VACATED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER that Defendants Motion to Exclude 126 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not be permitted to call Dr. Malec as an expert, or introduce any documents or evidentiary materials supporting its damages not disclosed in its initial disclosures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
September 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 110 Motion for Summary Judgment.The motion is GRANTED in that no genuine issue of material fact remains that Defendant Destiny Longlegs use of the men2rentnow.com website created a likelihood of confusion as to the source of services offered at that website. The motion is denied in all other respects. Granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion for Permanent Injunction. (See Order for Details)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Injunction 37 this Court previously entered in this case, as modified on June 4, 2010 116 , otherwiseremains in effect pending the outcome of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall forthwith meet and confer and shall, not later than September 30, 2010, file a proposed joint pretrial order in compliance with the Local Rules of this Court. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/3/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wintice Group v. Longleg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wintice Group
Represented By: Erin Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Destiny Longleg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tzar Technologies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?