Gray v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., et al.,
| Sherine Gray |
| Charles Willis and Harrah's Entertainment Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00218 |
| February 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations Office |
| Clark |
| George W Foley |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER on Jury Instructions. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 9/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER for the Filing of Objections or Joinder to 42 Proposed Pretrial Order by 3/25/2011. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER for the Filing of a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 1/21/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER for the Filing of a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 1/3/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 11/1/2010. By Deputy Clerk: Colleen Larsen. Denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; and Denying as moot 35 Request for Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
