Jackson v. Coates et al
Plaintiff: Patricia Jackson
Defendant: James Coates, United States of America and United States Department of Fish and Wildlife
Case Number: 2:2009cv00223
Filed: February 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: George W Foley
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/7/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
April 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER that Defendants Motions for Partial Dismissal of First Amended Complaint 72 73 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER Granting 76 Motion to Strike. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter scheduled to take place on Monday April 25, 2011 is vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER Granting 64 Unopposed Motion for Exception to Attendance at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER Referring Case to Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Extend Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/22/2010. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
September 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 40 is DENIED. The parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Order by 10/8/10. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Coates et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Jackson
Represented By: Cal J. Potter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Coates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Fish and Wildlife
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?