Momot v. Mastro et al
| John Momot |
| Dennis Mastro, Michael Mastro and Jeff Mastro |
| 2:2009cv00975 |
| May 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Roger L. Hunt |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
238
ORDER that the Court orders the parties to file a joint status report within 30 days following the termination of the Hearing. The Court further orders the parties to show cause why the case should not, in the meantime, be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until and unless the parties find it necessary to request that it be reopened. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER Withdrawing 167 , 173 , 200 , and 210 Pending Motions. This order does not affect the pendency of any motions before the Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER that 174 Defendants' Motion to Stay is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 225 USCA Memorandum/Opinion, the Clerk shall STAY the proceedings until further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER Granting 229 Motion Entry of Order on Mandate re 227 USCA Mandate. Defendants' motion to stay this action is granted pending the outcome of the Maricopa County arbitration. The permanent injunction is dissolved. Defendants are awarded their costs on appeal in the amount of $359.40. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER Granting 149 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 5/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER granting Mastros' 140 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re John Momot's tenth cause of action. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 4/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER Denying 125 Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Conference and Denying 127 Defendants' Cross Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 3/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER that Defendants Motion to Reconsider Dismissal of Count One of the Counterclaim or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Rule 54(b) Judgment 124 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
136
PROTECTIVE ORDER re 132 Order on Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 9/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER Denying 88 Defendants' Motion to Change Venue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 93 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. The motion is GRANTED as Defendants' claims for breach of contract, abuse of process, and negligent misrepresentation and DENIED as to Defendants' claim for fraud. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 7/6/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
