Hulihan v. Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada et al
| Sharon Hulihan |
| Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, First Transit and Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv01096 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER Denying 134 Motion for Certificate of Appealability as Moot. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A) that any appeal of the Court's Judgment in this matter would be taken in good faith. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 08/01/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration 127 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 6/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Recusal of District Judge 121 and Motion for Recusal of Magistrate Judge 122 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
117
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 10/19/2011. Prior to this Courts order 116 denying Plaintiffs motion 101 to amend summary judgment, Plaintiff filed a motion 110 for clarification on August 29, 2011. In her motion 110 for clarification, Plaintiff briefly references the arguments that Plaintiff presented in full in her motion 101 to amend summary judgment. The Court therefore finds that the issues presented in Plaintiffs motion 110 for clarification have been resolved by the Courts October 6, 2011 order 116 denying Plaintiffs motion 101 to amend summary judgment. Plaintiffs motion 110 for clarification is denied as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
114
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 10/5/2011 that Defendants motion 100 for attorneys fees and costs is DENIED without prejudice. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER granting 107 Motion to Extend Deadline. Replies due by 8/15/2011 re 101 MOTION to Amend Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 8/15/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
98
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 6/24/2011. Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification of order 79 . The motion for clarification is DENIED without prejudice. The hearing date which is referred to in the moti on has been vacated by the Court 97 . Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Reply to Judge Reed's Motion 78 ". Plaintiff's reply will be treated as a motion for reconsideration of order 88 . The motion to reconsider is DENIED. O rder 88 clearly makes reference to Plaintiff's motion to enter evidence 56 . Defendant's motion to strike 68 is GRANTED. It is premature to consider the admissibility of evidence to be presented at trial at this stage of the proceedings. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
96
ERROR: Judgment entered in error. JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 06/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SRK) Modified on 6/22/2011 (SRK).
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Denying 78 Motion to Retroactively File a Document without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 6/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 8/5/2010. This case is STAYED for 60 days during which time the parties may conduct discovery. Defendants motion for summary judgment 40 is DENIED without prejudice on the fo llowing basis: Defendants may re-file or file another motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day discovery period ends. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter within which time to file a response, and Defendants shall have seven (7) days within which time to file a reply. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
