Galindo v. St. Rose Dominican Hospital, a member of Catholic Healthcare West, a foreign non-profit corporation
| Valentine Galindo |
| St. Rose Dominican Hospital, a member of Catholic Healthcare West, a foreign non-profit corporation |
| 2:2009cv01097 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Galindo v. St. Rose Dominican Hospital, a member of Catholic Healthcare West, a foreign non-profit corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Valentine Galindo | |
| Represented By: | Sharon Nelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: St. Rose Dominican Hospital, a member of Catholic Healthcare West, a foreign non-profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | Seetal Tejura |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
