Levandoski et al v. Grandview Marketing, Inc. et al
| Thomas Levandoski, Michael Moretti and Joyce Vance |
| Grandview Marketing, Inc. and Kevin M. Sheehan |
| 2:2009cv01152 |
| June 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Defendant |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDERED that consolidated cases 2:09-cv-1150-RCJ-GWF and 2:09-cv-1152-RCJ-GWF are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Form for David Kruchek 106 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Forms for Marshan Ross, Pilar Hilton and Gloria Phillips 107 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Forms for Brendan M cGhee and Ingrid Zalaya 108 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Form for Kevin Rowlands 112 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Forms for Clarence Rice and Yan Li 119 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Forms for Harry Ridge and Robert Matuszewski 120 , Motion for Leave to File Late Consent Form for Kevin Angles 122 are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
