Clark v. Director of Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Michael Edward Clark |
Director of Nevada Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the United States |
2:2009cv01428 |
August 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Clark |
George Foley |
Roger L. Hunt |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 02/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 33 ORDER Denying as moot 31 Motion for Access to HDSP Law Library. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/25/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 26 ORDER Denying 25 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 7/19/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 23 ORDER Granting 14 Motion to Dismiss Ground One with Prejudice, Denying 19 Motion to Strike, and Denying 21 Motion for Sanctions and Copies. Respondents' Answers due 6/27/2010. Replies due by 8/11/2010. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/13/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.