Tablemax IP Holdings, Inc. et al v. Shuffle Master, Inc.
| Tablemax IP Holdings, Inc., Tablemax Gaming, Inc. and Vegas Amusement, Inc. |
| Shuffle Master, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv01519 |
| August 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Clark |
| Roger L. Hunt |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER that Defendants Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination 79 is GRANTED. The Markman Hearing, scheduled for 12/15/10, is cancelled until further order of the Court. The parties shall file a status report 90 days from the date of this Order and further status reports every 90 days thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 11/15/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Denying 69 Motion to Strike Shuffle Masters Revised Constructions and References to Abandoned Applications. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/12/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Denying 32 Motion for Hearing, Denying 33 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Denying 34 Motion to Strike, Denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Denying 40 Motion to Extend Time. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/26/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
