Austin-Fink v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
| 2:2009cv01981 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Philip M. Pro |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MDL TRANSFER ORDER re MDL No. 2325 - ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A, encompassing MDL No. 2325 actions involving AMS, are transferred to the Southern District of West Virginia and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge Joseph R. Goodwin for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Signed by John G. Heyburn II, Chairman, Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF) (Main Document 58 replaced on 2/8/2012) (AF).
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Errata filed by American Medical Systems, Inc. re 19 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 1/3/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 8/10/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Austin-Fink v. American Medical Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
