Kemp v. Skolnik et al
Case Number: 2:2009cv02002
Filed: October 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leavitt
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Pro
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER Denying 75 Plaintiff's Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Cole Morrow, Dwight Nevens, Greg Cox, Howard Skolnik, Isidro Baca, James Henson, Larry Wuest, William Kuloloia and against Plaintiff Keith Kemp. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 4/26/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
April 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER Denying 62 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to 65 MOTION to Dismiss by 4/24/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that all claims in 53 Amended Complaint are DISMISSED except: (a) the individual capacity due process claims in Count II: and (b) an individual capacity First Amendment claim in Count IX. Defendants Coleman, Lightsy, Eldon K. McDaniel, Palz ueski, Harry Peltzer, Debra Brooks and R. Chambliss terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General shall advise the Court within 21 days whether her office can accept service. Defendants shall file an answer 30 days from the date of no tice of acceptance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall regenerate electronic notices of prior filings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Amended Complaint with this order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/3/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: plaintiff - EDS)
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER re 55 Letter for Status Request filed by Keith Kemp. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
April 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER for the Filing of an Amended Pleading. Amended Pleading due 6/27/2011. Copy of dockets 30 and 47 mailed to Plaintiff with 7 blank copies of complaint form. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Granting Thirty Day Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint. Amended Complaint deadline: 2/23/2011. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Denying 37 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 38 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/29/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
November 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDERED that P's # 12 Motion for a 60-day extension of time ( in case no. 3:10-cv-00188 ) to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the instant action ( case no. 3:10-cv-00188 ) is CONSOLIDATED with Case No. 2:09-cv-0200 2-PMP-LRL. FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE FILED in Case No. 2:09- cv-02002-PMP-LRL and in the instant action ( case no. 3:10-cv-00188 ). FURTHER ORDERED that the instant case ( 3:10-cv-00188 ) is administratively closed, and all fur ther pleadings shall proceed under Case No. 2:09-cv-02002-PMP-LRL. FURTHER ORDERED that no further documents shall be filed in this closed action ( i.e., case no. 3:10-cv-00188 ). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/15/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Denying as Moot 25 Supplemental Motion to Extend Time. Amended Complaint deadline: 10/22/2010. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/13/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to File Longer than Normal Document and granting 23 Motion to Extend Deadline. Amended Complaint deadline: 10/22/2010. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER re 19 and 20 Letters for Status Request filed by Keith Kemp. If the Clerk has not received, in hand, an Amended Complaint within 15 days of entry of this order, this action will be dismissed without further advance notice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DENYING as moot Plaintiff's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Filing fee has been paid. Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Vacate Order is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 8 is DISMISSED without prej udice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff to file Amended Complaint within 30 days of this Order. All remaining motions 5 9 11 13 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/24/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, forms and copy of Amended Complaint to Plaintiff)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kemp v. Skolnik et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?