McAvoy v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc. et al
2:2009cv02074 |
October 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Contract: Other Office |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
James C. Mahan |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 58 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/17/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 55 ORDER Granting 54 Defendant Ameristar's Motion to Extend Time to file Reply to 44 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Reply due 9/21/10. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 43 ORDER Granting 41 Ameristar Casinos, Inc. Joinder to 40 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. Ameristar Casinos, Inc. answer due 7/20/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 7/6/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting Unopposed 40 Motion to Extend Time. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada answer due 7/20/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 7/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McAvoy v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.