Hajoca Corporation v. Associated Mechanical, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Hajoca Corporation v. Associated Mechanical, Inc. et al

Hajoca Corporation v. Associated Mechanical, Inc. et al

Case Number:	2:2009cv02087
Filed:	October 29, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Miller Act Office
Presiding Judge:	Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge:	Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1352 Miller Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 18, 2011	Filing 38 JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION in favor of Hajoca Corporation and against Amerind Builders, LLC in the amount of $14,866.29. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
February 7, 2011	Filing 33 ORDER that Hajocas motion for summary judgment 25 is DENIED. Amerind and Scarboroughs cross-motion for summary judgment 29 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART on the following basis: GRANTED as to the payment bond claim, and DENIED as to the u njust enrichment claim. The action having been dismissed as to E. C. Scarborough with respect to the payment bond claim, which is the only claim made by Plaintiff against Scarborough, the action has been concluded as to Defendant Scarborough. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 18, 2011

Filing 38 JUDGMENT BY CONFESSION in favor of Hajoca Corporation and against Amerind Builders, LLC in the amount of $14,866.29. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

February 7, 2011

Filing 33 ORDER that Hajocas motion for summary judgment 25 is DENIED. Amerind and Scarboroughs cross-motion for summary judgment 29 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART on the following basis: GRANTED as to the payment bond claim, and DENIED as to the u njust enrichment claim. The action having been dismissed as to E. C. Scarborough with respect to the payment bond claim, which is the only claim made by Plaintiff against Scarborough, the action has been concluded as to Defendant Scarborough. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hajoca Corporation v. Associated Mechanical, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?